<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti-gravity Patent: the United States Patent Office Looking Patently Foolish</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2006/01/29/anti-gravity-patent-the-united-states-patent-office-looking-patently-foolish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2006/01/29/anti-gravity-patent-the-united-states-patent-office-looking-patently-foolish/</link>
	<description>Opinionated Intellectual Property News Blog with an Israel Slant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:46:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Jackson Apparently Co-invented The Anti-Gravity Effect &#171; The IP Factor</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2006/01/29/anti-gravity-patent-the-united-states-patent-office-looking-patently-foolish/#comment-48218</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Jackson Apparently Co-invented The Anti-Gravity Effect &#171; The IP Factor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 05:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipfactor.wordpress.com/2006/01/29/anti-gravity-patent-the-united-states-patent-office-looking-patently-foolish/#comment-48218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to defying gravity, for a less mundane approach, see: Anti-gravity Patent: the United States Patent Office Looking Patently Foolish Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Michael Jackson Update…Obituary: Michael [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to defying gravity, for a less mundane approach, see: Anti-gravity Patent: the United States Patent Office Looking Patently Foolish Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Michael Jackson Update…Obituary: Michael [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin F Leighton</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2006/01/29/anti-gravity-patent-the-united-states-patent-office-looking-patently-foolish/#comment-47924</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin F Leighton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipfactor.wordpress.com/2006/01/29/anti-gravity-patent-the-united-states-patent-office-looking-patently-foolish/#comment-47924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consider this argument

Electrons have gravitational mass

electrons are effected by electro-magnetic fields

The photoelectric effect allows conversion of electrons to photons, which are not effected by gravity

super fluids and superconductors could allow the modulation of mass effects by altering the gravitational interaction of particles within an asymmetric closed loop.

If gravity is a particle or string, it will interact probabilistically with matter. What does it mean for an object to have momentum? What about motion is self perpetuating? To me it suggests a freewheeling nature to spacetime. Is the inertia of an object stored in the object itself or in the surrounding environment? It seems to make sense that inertia itself will be tied to valance bands within the atom corresponding to their energy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider this argument</p>
<p>Electrons have gravitational mass</p>
<p>electrons are effected by electro-magnetic fields</p>
<p>The photoelectric effect allows conversion of electrons to photons, which are not effected by gravity</p>
<p>super fluids and superconductors could allow the modulation of mass effects by altering the gravitational interaction of particles within an asymmetric closed loop.</p>
<p>If gravity is a particle or string, it will interact probabilistically with matter. What does it mean for an object to have momentum? What about motion is self perpetuating? To me it suggests a freewheeling nature to spacetime. Is the inertia of an object stored in the object itself or in the surrounding environment? It seems to make sense that inertia itself will be tied to valance bands within the atom corresponding to their energy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony rod</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2006/01/29/anti-gravity-patent-the-united-states-patent-office-looking-patently-foolish/#comment-47680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tony rod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 16:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipfactor.wordpress.com/2006/01/29/anti-gravity-patent-the-united-states-patent-office-looking-patently-foolish/#comment-47680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the application of electron spin has surprise the classic theory groups, nature has been doing this for years, but classic theory based on limited math has hindered much needed progress. the use of finite elements could be of great help. after all, theory, science, math are just tools, not the answer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the application of electron spin has surprise the classic theory groups, nature has been doing this for years, but classic theory based on limited math has hindered much needed progress. the use of finite elements could be of great help. after all, theory, science, math are just tools, not the answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

