<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USPTO Announces Accelerated Review Option</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2006/07/11/uspto-announces-accelerated-review-option/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2006/07/11/uspto-announces-accelerated-review-option/</link>
	<description>Opinionated Intellectual Property News Blog with an Israel Slant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:46:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2006/07/11/uspto-announces-accelerated-review-option/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 02:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ipfactor.wordpress.com/2006/07/11/uspto-announces-accelerated-review-option/#comment-128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In some arts (like mine), time to first action is a year. The best thing that the applicant can do to speed up prosecution is to accurately define the invention in the claims and for them to be grammatically correct.  Also a tiny few cases get misclassified in the wrong art unit and bounce around the office until someone claims it (sometimes for years). Somehow giving the classifier a hint of where the app is to go (such as citing similar applications in the IDS) is a way to make sure that doesn&#039;t happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In some arts (like mine), time to first action is a year. The best thing that the applicant can do to speed up prosecution is to accurately define the invention in the claims and for them to be grammatically correct.  Also a tiny few cases get misclassified in the wrong art unit and bounce around the office until someone claims it (sometimes for years). Somehow giving the classifier a hint of where the app is to go (such as citing similar applications in the IDS) is a way to make sure that doesn&#8217;t happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

