<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Israel Patent Office Allows Two Companies to Register Same Trademark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2009/05/06/israel-patent-office-allows-two-companies-to-register-same-trademark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2009/05/06/israel-patent-office-allows-two-companies-to-register-same-trademark/</link>
	<description>Opinionated Intellectual Property News Blog with an Israel Slant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:47:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Filtron Trademark Rejected as Confusing to Public &#171; The IP Factor</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2009/05/06/israel-patent-office-allows-two-companies-to-register-same-trademark/#comment-50931</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Filtron Trademark Rejected as Confusing to Public &#171; The IP Factor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/?p=734#comment-50931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Comment I think decision is correct and we are pleased that she has ignored the &#8220;XO&#8221; decision by Deputy Commissioner Shalev Shmulovits who decided that where there is no issue of equitable behavior, there is no problem for two nearly identicval products (i.e. energy drinks) to share the same name see http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2009/05/06/israel-patent-office-allows-two-companies-to-register-same-tra...  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comment I think decision is correct and we are pleased that she has ignored the &#8220;XO&#8221; decision by Deputy Commissioner Shalev Shmulovits who decided that where there is no issue of equitable behavior, there is no problem for two nearly identicval products (i.e. energy drinks) to share the same name see <a href="http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2009/05/06/israel-patent-office-allows-two-companies-to-register-same-tra... " rel="nofollow">http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2009/05/06/israel-patent-office-allows-two-companies-to-register-same-tra&#8230; </a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

