<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should J.D. Salinger be able to prevent a sequel to Catcher in the Rye?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2009/06/04/should-j-d-salinger-be-able-to-prevent-a-sequel-to-catcher-in-the-rye/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2009/06/04/should-j-d-salinger-be-able-to-prevent-a-sequel-to-catcher-in-the-rye/</link>
	<description>Opiniated Intellectual Property News Blog with an Israel Slant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:57:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Factor</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2009/06/04/should-j-d-salinger-be-able-to-prevent-a-sequel-to-catcher-in-the-rye/#comment-48135</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Factor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/?p=832#comment-48135</guid>
		<description>U.S. District Judge Deborah Batts has issued a temporary injunction, so you are in good company. 

The author of the sequel claims that it is legitimate criticism, but the judge is on record as saying that she had &quot;difficulty&quot; seeing that criticism.

Judge Batts has 10 days to make a final ruling on whether to block the publication of &quot;60 Years Later&quot;, but she can extend that deadline if she xonsiders it necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. District Judge Deborah Batts has issued a temporary injunction, so you are in good company. </p>
<p>The author of the sequel claims that it is legitimate criticism, but the judge is on record as saying that she had &#8220;difficulty&#8221; seeing that criticism.</p>
<p>Judge Batts has 10 days to make a final ruling on whether to block the publication of &#8220;60 Years Later&#8221;, but she can extend that deadline if she xonsiders it necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ana</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2009/06/04/should-j-d-salinger-be-able-to-prevent-a-sequel-to-catcher-in-the-rye/#comment-48121</link>
		<dc:creator>ana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/?p=832#comment-48121</guid>
		<description>I personally don&#039;t think J.D. California has any right to write that sequel. Like Salinger says (from what I&#039;ve heard) it is not a parody but a rip-off. Cather in the Rye is my favourite book, and only Salinger should be able to create a sequel if he chose to do so. Anyone else is just trying to cash in on one of the most amazing books ever written.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally don&#8217;t think J.D. California has any right to write that sequel. Like Salinger says (from what I&#8217;ve heard) it is not a parody but a rip-off. Cather in the Rye is my favourite book, and only Salinger should be able to create a sequel if he chose to do so. Anyone else is just trying to cash in on one of the most amazing books ever written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
