<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jerusalem Court Issues Temporary Injunction Against Copycat Challah Cover Manufacturers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2009/12/31/jerusalem-court-issues-temporary-injunction-against-copycat-challah-cover-manufacturers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2009/12/31/jerusalem-court-issues-temporary-injunction-against-copycat-challah-cover-manufacturers/</link>
	<description>Opinionated Intellectual Property News Blog with an Israel Slant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:46:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Israel Ministry of Justice Proposes Amendment to Patent Law « The IP Factor</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2009/12/31/jerusalem-court-issues-temporary-injunction-against-copycat-challah-cover-manufacturers/#comment-50957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Israel Ministry of Justice Proposes Amendment to Patent Law « The IP Factor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/?p=1776#comment-50957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in a case involved challah cloths that were similar to those of another manufacturer. See Jerusalem Court Issues Temporary Injunction Against Copycat Challah Cover Manufacturers. I criticized granting temporary injunctions and referring to property rights where the plaintiff [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in a case involved challah cloths that were similar to those of another manufacturer. See Jerusalem Court Issues Temporary Injunction Against Copycat Challah Cover Manufacturers. I criticized granting temporary injunctions and referring to property rights where the plaintiff [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Israel Patent Office Refuses Revival Of Design Applications, But So What? &#171; The IP Factor</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2009/12/31/jerusalem-court-issues-temporary-injunction-against-copycat-challah-cover-manufacturers/#comment-50935</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Israel Patent Office Refuses Revival Of Design Applications, But So What? &#171; The IP Factor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 02:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/?p=1776#comment-50935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] registered design, the applicant got a temporary injunction in this case.  In a recent posting, http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2009/12/31/jerusalem-court-issues-temporary-injunction-against-copycat-ch... a company who didn&#8217;t bother to file a design application at all got sweeping temporary [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] registered design, the applicant got a temporary injunction in this case.  In a recent posting, <a href="http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2009/12/31/jerusalem-court-issues-temporary-injunction-against-copycat-ch... a" rel="nofollow">http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2009/12/31/jerusalem-court-issues-temporary-injunction-against-copycat-ch&#8230; a</a> company who didn&#8217;t bother to file a design application at all got sweeping temporary [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

