<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: European Court of Justice recognizes &#8216;Vorsprung Durch Technik&#8217; As Distinctive Trademark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2010/01/25/european-court-of-justice-recognizes-vorsprung-durch-technik-as-distinctive-trademark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2010/01/25/european-court-of-justice-recognizes-vorsprung-durch-technik-as-distinctive-trademark/</link>
	<description>Opinionated Intellectual Property News Blog with an Israel Slant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:46:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jetzt in 5 Sprachen!! Marta Anmutig und fit durch Bauchtanz :: LARP Costumes, LARP kit, LARP FTW</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2010/01/25/european-court-of-justice-recognizes-vorsprung-durch-technik-as-distinctive-trademark/#comment-56713</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jetzt in 5 Sprachen!! Marta Anmutig und fit durch Bauchtanz :: LARP Costumes, LARP kit, LARP FTW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 20:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/?p=1898#comment-56713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] European Court of Justice recognizes &#039;Vorsprung Durch Technik&#039; As &#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] European Court of Justice recognizes &#039;Vorsprung Durch Technik&#039; As &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is the glass of Coca Cola half empty or half full? &#171; The IP Factor</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2010/01/25/european-court-of-justice-recognizes-vorsprung-durch-technik-as-distinctive-trademark/#comment-51223</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is the glass of Coca Cola half empty or half full? &#171; The IP Factor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/?p=1898#comment-51223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] World.  The Appointed Person, cited the recent ECJ decision in Audi AG v OHIM, Case C-398/08, see http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2010/01/25/european-court-of-justice-recognizes-vorsprung-durch-technik-a... and held that the mere fact that a mark was perceived as being a promotional statement and, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] World.  The Appointed Person, cited the recent ECJ decision in Audi AG v OHIM, Case C-398/08, see <a href="http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2010/01/25/european-court-of-justice-recognizes-vorsprung-durch-technik-a... and" rel="nofollow">http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2010/01/25/european-court-of-justice-recognizes-vorsprung-durch-technik-a&#8230; and</a> held that the mere fact that a mark was perceived as being a promotional statement and, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

