Opposition Proceedings Adequate in Competing Trademarks Case

Under Israel Law, where two trademark applications for the same mark are pending allowance concurrently, the marks are considered competing marks, and, the Israel Patent and Trademark Office is supposed to  ascertain which mark takes precedence. The first to file is of importance, but equitable behaviour and widespread usage of the mark are also considerations.

Israel Trademark Application Nos. 197933 and 197934 to Vivartia, “7 Days” were filed prior to a competing identical mark being allowed.  This was not noted by the examiner as apparently their mark had not yet been entered into the database when the competing mark was examined. the competing mark was allowed and these marks were thus rejected.

Dr. Shlomo Cohen Law Offices argued on behalf of the applicants that the earlier mark was allowed by mistake and the marks should be considered competing marks. The Deputy Commissioner of Trademarks, Noach Shmulovich Shalev  ruled that since the applicants could oppose the allowed mark or initiate annulment proceedings, there was no need to disallow the mark and institute a competing mark proceedings.

One Response to Opposition Proceedings Adequate in Competing Trademarks Case

  1. [...] Opposition proceedings adequate in competing trademarks case (IP Factor) [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 92 other followers