Elle’s Belles!

June 2, 2010

When Venus Fashions and Grapholite Moses Printers LTD launched their Hebrew Language magazine Belle in Israel, Elle, the international women’s magazine sued for an injunction. Both magazines focus on women’s fashion, beauty, health, and entertainment.

Elle was founded in 1945. With a circulation of over a million copies a month, it is the world’s most popular woman’s magazine. Although translated into some two dozen languages, there is no Hebrew edition.

Elle means “she” in French, and Belle means “Pretty Woman”.

In granting a temporary injunction, Judge Yehuda Zefet ruled that many readers would not know what Belle meant. Personally, I would assume a greater literacy amongst Israeli women, and would expect them to know what both elle and belle mean. I also find the judge’s ruling that the B gets swallowed when saying belle unconvincing. B is a labial sound that is formed by the lips and is NOT swallowed.

The judge correctly points out that the magazine covers are similar, in that in each case the name is written across the top and there is a photo of an attractive female underneath. However, this style of magazine cover design is hardly unique to Elle, and is shared by other women’s (and indeed men’s magazines).

Although, it is not impossible that someone would see the magazine and assume it was Elle in Hebrew, since Elle does not have a Hebrew version yet, confusion would hardly be likely to affect Elle’s sales. Nevertheless, the judge ruled that Elle had a good chance to prevail in the main judgment and that Belle, with only one issue under their belt is not well-known so issuing a temporary injunction against the publishers using the name Belle would have only minor consequences for them.

Judge Zefet issued a temporary injunction against Belle, awarding Elle costs of NIS 35,000 – close to $10,000. Belle’s owners have been ordered to collect the unsold magazines from distributors in the meantime, with Elle posting a security to cover damages if they lose the main case.

We note that there are a number of magazines called Belle in other countries (see above) and consider both names somewhat generic. Ironically, I doubt that Elle could have got an injunction against Belle in a French-speaking country like France or Belgium. It seems rather like Woman’s Own getting an injunction against Woman’s Weekly, or Time Magazine getting an injunction against the New York Times.


Israel joins the Madrid Protocol

May 31, 2010

Last week, the Israel Government voted to join the Madrid Protocol for the registration of trademarks,and today, on behalf of the Minister of Trade and Industry, Dr. Meir Noam, Israel Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks presented a letter to Francis Gurry, the Director of the World Intellectual Property Office (WIPO).

Israel amended her laws to facilitate this a couple of years ago, but, due to problems with the trademark website, implementation was put off indefinitely. Now the treaty will come into effect in three months time on September 1, 2010.

Dr Noam, Nurit Maoz, Li Maor and everyone else who was involved behind the scenes are to be congratulated.


Boston 2010 – INTA Conference

May 30, 2010

I am just back from INTA in Boston – a great tea-party with 8300 participants and perhaps a further 1500 on-schleppers who came for the receptions, etc. but didn’t bother registering.

As we had a booth, I was busy with that and didn’t manage to attend any of the lectures. Instead of reviewing the sessions, which have been covered by other bloggers anyway, I shall, instead, review the freebies!

The following is the consensus reached with my ultra-critical progeny:

Fancy Dress

  1. Soei win hands down with their kimono ninja costumes in blue and pink
  2. Global Estimator come second with their Hawaii flower necklaces in non-crush artificial silk
  3. Acharya‘s cricket fielder’s hat is also worthy of mention being lightweight and comfortable

Back to School – Stationary

  1. Lehmann Lee distributed some very nice pencil cases
  2. OceanMoto had the best pens, which were also nicely boxed
  3. The Pencil division was won hands down by Canadian firm Fasken Martineau who had some really cool pencils having a curly end that was almost treble-clefian in complexity and which matches their logo. I am notm sure how it was manufactured.
  4. Innovia / Pipers gave out some slide-rules for calculating PCT dates, but the kids weren’t very impressed, neither with the functionality not with the product being made of flimsy cardboard
  5. Patrafee gave out a set of 12 wax crayons

Memory Sticks

The highest volume disk-on-key is won by the Office of Harmonization with a 4 Meg mammoth capacity memory stick, that, for some reason, was very bulky. WIPO were giving out very nice leather-bound memory sticks, preloaded with Madrid Info.

Cuddly toys

Lehmann Lee were the only competitor in this section with a furry lion key ring that seems a little large as a key-fob but a bit small as a comforter.

Presents for spouses and assistants

Soei had some nice Japanese business card holders and Kangxin had both passport covers and a sort of vanity purse (I think). I explained to the wife that I’d chosen these items specially after going into innumerable stores, but I am not sure she was convinced.

Office Ornaments

Grant Thornton Yafi & Co. a Lebanese firm had a nice Phoenician knickknack that could add a touch of class to many reception areas. The firm is also worthy of mention due to their authentic Lebanese bakhlava – which is less sticky than the Turkish variety that is more commonly available in Israel.

Party Section

 Finnegan gave a great bash in a blues club, with Electric Light Orchestra providing the entertainment. Soei‘s Japanese themed party attracted some 1500 participants and is also most worthy of mention.

Michael Chesal of Perretz Chessal Herrman deserves a special mention for hosting a Kosher dinner in China Taam, a Kosher Brookline restaurant. Their dessert chocolate business card was delicious.

Incidentally, the INTA opening reception also had a Kosher table, and Sandy apparently held his annual reception with its trademark chopped liver.

I understand from Jeremy Ben-David that in previous years, there were more and more ostentacious parties, but things were toned down due to the recession.


Naomi Ragen Accused of Plagiarism – Again

May 9, 2010

In yet another law-suit, Naomi Ragen is being sued for copyright infringement for basing part of one of her novels on someone else’s book. This time, a 78 year old American, Cynthia Rosengarten, a Babov Hassid living in Bnei  claims that Ragen’s book, The Sacrifice of Tamar (1994) is based on her novel – based on her son’s arranged marriage, that was published in 1991, and is suing the author and the Keter Publishing House for 2.5 Million Shequels.

This law-suit is similar to and inspired by the suits brought by Michal Tal and Sarah Shapiro against Ragen who make similar charges. See 

Best Selling Author Sued for Plagarism

We wonder isn’t there some statute of limitations? Presumably the plaintiff could have sued 15 years ago. Why wait?

I have read Ragen’s books, but not those of the other authors.  I therefore cannot offer an opinion on the degree of similarity. I think that most novels owe something to the genre and that there are always similarities.

In 1592, Shakespeare, Greene asserted was an “upstart crow, beautified with our feathers, that, with his Tygers heart wrapt in a Players hide”

“Copy from one, it’s plagiarism; copy from two, it’s research”,  Wilson Mizner

“Originality is undetected plagiarism” William Ralph Inge

Anyway, our friend Adv. Gilad Corinaldi is prosecuting the case. we wait to watch developments.


Israel Patent Office Commemorates World IP Day

April 28, 2010

In a positive gesture to spread the word on World IP Day, 14 intrepid Israel Patent Agency (nee Office) staff went to high schools, both religious and secular, in Jerusalem and Modiin to teach the pupils about IP.

The team of civil servants included patent and trademark examiners and also management.

We welcome this initiative and hope it is extended to the Arab and ultra-Orthodox sectors.

Perhaps, if patent attorneys in private practice join the initiative and all 100 examiners hit the streets next year, we can educate all Israel’s teenagers about the fascinating stuff we do.


Jury finds Protonix patent infringed by Teva

April 24, 2010

A jury in the U.S. District Court for New Jersey has found in favour of Pfizer, ruling that the patent on its Protonix acid reflux drug is valid and infringed by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, which has been selling a generic version of the drug since 2007.

The Jury rejected allegations by Israel’s Teva and India’s Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries that the patent for the widely used drug was obvious and should be declared invalid, Pfizer said.

The original patent on Protonix, known chemically as pantoprazole, is held by Swiss drugmaker Nycomed [NYCMD.UL] and was licensed to Wyeth, which is now owned by Pfizer. Nycomed and Wyeth filed their patent infringement lawsuit against Teva and Sun in May 2004. “We are pleased with the jury’s findings,” Pfizer said in a statement. “The jury held that the patent was not invalid, rejecting allegations by several generic companies that the patent was obvious.”

Pfizer and Teva agree that there are open legal issues still to be decided by the judge presiding over the case. Teva apparently claims that the District Court judge can still invalidate the patent independent of the Jury’s decision. The final decision could and probably would be appealed. “If we are successful at the end of this process, we will be seeking the full measure of our damages,” Pfizer spokesman Christopher Loder said. If successful, Pfizer will claim triple damages for willful infringement, and legal fees.

COMMENT

Patent validity requires novelty, utility and non-obviousness. The requirement for non-obviousness is defined as non-obvious to the skilled person of the art. I am a great fan of the jury system, and believe that a jury of men can determine by a majority, if something is beyond reasonable doubt. I am not sure that the same jury can reasonably determine whether something is or is not obvious to the hypothetical skilled man of the art.


Is it right for lawyers to blog criticisms of court rulings?

April 19, 2010

Advocate Yael Gil has criticized court decisions. Her field of practice is apparently family law, and, on her blog at the Marker Cafe  http://cafe.themarker.com/view.php?u=152952 she has accused decisions as being sexist, and has accused the light of justice of the court of dimming. In flowery language she has accused the court of ruling against the law and against the precedence of the Supreme Court, and hopes that the district court will overturn a verdict on appeal.

So what? Well following a prisoner throwing a shoe at the President of the Supreme Court and a couple of attacks on judges, for some time know there has been wide-scale newspaper debate in Israel as to whether it is acceptable to criticize judges, where and how.

A fellow lawyer, Gadi Navon, has complained about Adv. Yael Gil to the Ethics Committee of the Tel Aviv District of the Israel Bar accusing her of incitement. His position is that if lawyers are outspoken against the courts, then the public will think that insulting the courts and the judges is legitimate.

As a blogger who reports on IP decisions, and where I believe a ruling is wrong, am critical of it, I support Adv. Yael Gil’s right to criticize specific decisions. I further believe it is legitimate to be critical of apparent trends.

I have recently blogged a number of decisions that I am very critical of and believe to be wrong. These include:

  •  Shemesh a Supreme Court judge overturning a temproary injunction and deciding that a common word “Shemesh” – meaning sun that is successfully registered as a trademark shouldn’t give the mark owner a presumption of exclusive usage of the word in names for Middle East Grill and Shwarma restaurants (so why have trademarks?)
  • Karshi - a Jerusalem judge forbidding an Israeli Judaica company to sell their goods abroad (outside his jurisdiction, no authority to do so)
  • Toto- Winner the Supreme Court misapplying A.Sh.I.R. and ruling that in cases not protectable by copyright – which does not require registration anyway, plaintiffs cannot be awarded damages under the Law of Unjust Enrichment.

I am regularly critical of patent office decisions, and, on occasion, accuse the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks of legislating beyond his authority, with changes in the Law ruled in circulars really requiring the minister of Justice or, in some case, the Knesset.

Now and again I have been slightly disrespectful and the Commissioner contacted the head of our professional organization.  I appologized to him.  One should always try to criticize the decisions and not the judges themselves and I advise Ms Gil to be careful to criticize decisions and laws and not the judges themselves. However judges do make mistakes and it is legitimate and healthy to criticize their decisions.

I am reminded of a lovely story in the Tractate Blessings of the Babylonian Talmud where Rabbi Meir was troubled with hooligans in his jurisdiction. He wanted to pray for them to be dealt with. His wife, Bruria explained that one can pray for hooliganism to be eliminated and not for hooligans to be eliminated. Rabbi Meir prayed for their repentance.

I will continue to criticize specific decisions, trends and inconsistencies, but try to refrain from criticizing the judges themselves. I see this as a positive contribution to free speech and to open government.

I believe that the laws of libel, slander and the like, are quite adequate. Blog on Yael!


Morrocanoil, lacks distinctiveness, being geographical indication

April 15, 2010

Moroccanoil is an Israeli company that manufactures hair products from Argan oil, which is apparently used in Moroccan cooking, and is native to Morocco.

Determining the brand to be descriptive as to origin, the Deputy Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks at the Israel Patent Office has rejected trademark numbers 205142 and 205143 for the stylized name in English and for Moroccan Oil in Hebrew.

The Deputy Commissioner rejected arguments that other countries have registered the mark, and that the product was developed here.

Comment

The company Morrocanoil does not sell oil, but hair products containing argan oil. The name, even in Hebrew, is therefore not descriptive in the sense that something labelled as Golan Wine or Cheddar Cheese is.  

Nevertheless, I consider the decision reasonable, but somewhat arbitrary in that it is not totally consistent with other Israel patent office decisions. Indeed, I fail to see any trend at all in cases like this. The arbitrary nature and the fact that other countries rule differently should strike a warning bell to Israeli companies planning on filing via the Madrid Protocol. A decision like this in the registrant’s national trademark office could invalidate marks filed elsewhere. The moral is that come September 1, with Israel implementing the Madrid Protocol, it will be necessary to seek expert advice as to whether to go the potentially cheaper Madrid route, or whether it would be safer to file separate applications directly in each jurisdiction.

Another question of interest, is whether it ever makes sense to choose a place name as a mark? Think what aggravation could have been saved if neither Budweiser beer had chosen the place name, but had given an arbitrary name to their beer like Mudwise or something.


USPTO Considering Extending Provisional Patent Applications by 12 Months

April 7, 2010

In a surprising move, the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO David Kappos is considering extending the US Provisional Application pendency from one year to two years. See http://www.uspto.gov/news/pr/2010/10_10.jsp

I find the idea a little crazy. In the US the patent currently goes to the first to invent, not the first to file, and one can use the provisional filing date as pretty good indication of when one had the invention reduced to practice as described. Elsewhere, one assumes the Paris Convention would apply and so priority could not be claimed from the provisional in other jurisdictions.

Seems like a non-starter.


Taro Receives Patent for New Drug

April 6, 2010

Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. have announced that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has issued the company a patent for its non-sedating barbiturate drug T2007, which is currently under development.

T2007 is the sodium salt of DPB (diphenyl barbituric acid), and its use is directed to its anti-epileptic properties. In animal models, DPB has an efficacy comparable to phenobarbital, a long-established clinical treatment for epilepsy.

We view this development with interest. Taro is yet another Israel based pharmaceutical company that appears to be moving into the ethical drug development area.  That said, Sun Pharmaceuticals are trying to buy up Taro, so it might end up an Indian company.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 103 other followers