Indian Court Rejects Magnum Trademark for Cigarettes

In a somewhat Bizarre ruling, the Indian High Court has ruled that Magnum cannot be registered as a trademark for cigarettes since it is a generic type word meaning big.

Now, for Champagne, magnum should not be allowed, but the term is used and trademarked for handguns, cars, investment funds and why not cigarettes? Why are Classic, Gold, Silk Cut better terms. Is magnum synonymous with King Size? We think not.



Categories: India, trademarks

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: