Aminach LTD filed Israel trademark application No. 233949 Visco-gel for Mattresses, beds, sofa beds, armchairs and furniture for bedrooms; all included in Class 20.
The Health Center D. A. LTD. opposed the mark. On 12 January 2014, the opposition was refused and the trademark was registered.
Aminach now filed a costs request for 81,391 Shekels. This included 78,739,45 shekels for 52.7 hours work of lead counsel, 3.6 hours work of a junior lawyer, and 1.93 hours work of a trainee. The difference of 2652 Shekels covered courier expenses, printing costs, fax costs and recording the hearing.
The Health Center D. A. LTD. considered the costs charged as exorbitant and referred to the minimum recommended fee established by the Israel Bar for oppositions, which, in 2014 stood at 1859 Shekels, which is rather less.
The Health Center D. A. LTD. also noted that there was no contract provided that set out a fee scale or tax invoices showing that the fees were indeed paid. Finally, the respondent also noted that costs were awarded in the original decision and there was no justification to charge this twice.
The Commissioner reiterated that an applicant who overcomes an opposition is entitled to payment of legal costs. He did not consider that the amount of time spent was unreasonable for the amount of work done, nor did he consider that there was a difference between pro forma invoices and actual tax invoices.
The Commissioner did not find the minimum charges established by the Israel Bar were binding on attorneys, nor on the Patent Office when deciding fair costs.
Since costs of 7000 Shekels were awarded for a specific action in the original decision, the costs of 13,480 Shekels that were calculated for the same action at this stage was considered as double billing. Furthermore, costs of 1440 Shekels for postponing the hearing were considered unnecessary since the opposer didn’t have a problem with this, so this fee was canceled.
The Commissioner ruled that the remainder of 66, 400 Shekels (nearly $20,000) should be settled within 30 days, or the sum would be index linked and would accumulate interest.
The term visco-gel relates to material properties and is descriptive. I don’t believe that mark should have been allowed. The costs are high, but not unreasonably so.